Students need safer reporting
Many concerns never reach the right team because the path feels unclear, unsafe, or too informal.
Aura is building the trust layer for student safety and campus support.
Colleges need a safer way to hear students, protect sensitive concerns, coordinate response teams, and prove that every case was handled responsibly. Aura turns fragmented reporting into a governed support system for modern campuses powered by Tenori AI infrastructure.
Audience
Colleges & universities
Category
Student safety
AI cost / session
~$0.0018
The opportunity
Campus support is still too fragmented for the risks institutions now face.
Student concerns often move through scattered forms, informal messages, manual follow-ups, and unclear ownership. That creates slow response, privacy exposure, weak accountability, and poor visibility into repeated campus issues.
Staff need clearer workflows
Review teams need assignment, status, evidence, and follow-up history in one place.
Leadership needs visibility
Administrators need to see recurring issues and prove that sensitive cases were handled responsibly.
CORE FEATURES
Structured support for every campus concern
From first report to final resolution, Aura keeps every concern on a governed, accountable track.
Student reporting
Students raise incidents, grievances, and wellbeing concerns through guided digital forms instead of scattered offline channels.
Role-based dashboards
Students, faculty, support staff, and administrators each see only the work that belongs to them — with clear status and ownership.
Private case handling
High-risk reports move into a restricted investigation flow with tighter access control and a fully auditable review history.
Wellbeing support
Student wellbeing concerns become structured reports for authorized staff, with logged access to sensitive identity details.
HOW IT WORKS
From student voice to institutional action
Aura guides every report through a structured path: from intake to resolution, with full visibility and audit trails at every step.
Step 1 of 5
Incident intake
Students submit reports through guided forms. Aura captures context, urgency, and identity protection needs in a single submission.
20%
Campus workflow examples
Real-world student support scenarios.
Here are four common campus workflows that Aura transforms from scattered channels into governed, accountable processes.
Incident response
- 1A student submits a report.
- 2Aura organizes the concern and routes it to the right review path.
- 3Staff take action, update status, and leave an accountable record.
Campus-wide grievances
- 1Students submit public-facing concerns.
- 2Aura groups repeated themes into visible issue threads.
- 3Leadership can respond to patterns instead of isolated noise.
Sensitive investigations
- 1High-risk reports are separated from public workflows.
- 2Only authorized administrators can review and progress the case.
- 3Follow-up and review history remain controlled and auditable.
Wellbeing escalation
- 1A concern is converted into a neutral support report.
- 2Authorized staff can review the situation with better context.
- 3Identity access is tracked when sensitive details are revealed.
Why Aura can win
Trust and privacy are product features, not afterthoughts.
The strongest wedge is the combination of student-friendly reporting with institution-grade controls. Aura is built for sensitive environments where privacy, access, and accountability matter.
Investor signals
- Clear institutional buyer: colleges and universities
- High-trust problem space with recurring operational pain
- Multiple entry points: incident reporting, grievances, wellbeing, and student support
- Privacy-first design creates differentiation in a sensitive category
- Expandable from one campus workflow into a broader student-safety operating system
Designed for trust-sensitive growth
Aura can start with a single institutional pain point, then expand into wellbeing, sensitive investigations, response analytics, and campus-wide support operations.
SafetyGovernanceWellbeingAccountabilityCampus visibility
AI infrastructure costs
Remarkably low cost per student interaction.
Each Aura session runs 13 Gemini 2.0 Flash API calls across 4 AI flows. Total cost per session is ~$0.0018 — making campus-wide deployment economically viable from day one.
Per-session token breakdown — 13 API calls
Gemini 2.0 Flash · $0.10/1M input · $0.40/1M output
| Flow | Calls | Input tokens | Output tokens | Total | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mentalHealthChatFlow | 8 | 9,354 | 1,064 | 10,418 | $0.001362 |
| clarifyDistress | 2 | 439 | 83 | 522 | $0.000077 |
| generateNeutralReport | 2 | 900 | 302 | 1,202 | $0.000210 |
| classifyIncidentReport | 1 | 580 | 119 | 699 | $0.000106 |
| Total | 13 | 11,273 | 1,568 | 12,841 | $0.001755 |
50 students
$0.00025
~100 sessions / hr
500 students
$0.0024
1,000 sessions / hr
5,000 students
$0.024
10,000 sessions / hr
50,000 students
$0.24
100,000 sessions / hr
Cost verification: Input: 11,273 × $0.10 ÷ 1,000,000 = $0.001127 · Output: 1,568 × $0.40 ÷ 1,000,000 = $0.000627 · Total = $0.001755 / session
Closing thesis
Aura can become the operating system for campus trust.
The wedge is student reporting. The expansion is institutional response, sensitive-case handling, wellbeing support, and campus-wide visibility. The long-term value is a defensible trust layer for colleges that need safer, clearer, and more accountable student support — at a cost structure that scales from 50 to 50,000 students without meaningful infrastructure overhead.